For more than two decades, Saru Jayaraman has been advocating for fair wages in the restaurant industry. Recently, her efforts seem to be gaining traction, partly fueled by the phenomenon of "tipping fatigue." This fatigue is evident as consumers are increasingly asked to tip in various settings, often feeling overwhelmed and questioning the necessity. In the past year, Jayaraman has encountered requests for tips from baristas in Berkeley, a florist in New York City, and even from self-serve checkout kiosks at airports. These constant demands for tips leave many, including Jayaraman, wondering who they are actually tipping. Despite the exhaustion, Jayaraman sees this trend as an opportunity to highlight her long-standing campaign against unfair wage practices.
A Bankrate survey supports this sentiment, showing that two-thirds of Americans feel negatively about tipping, with 70% believing it is expected in more places than ever. More than half think businesses are replacing employee salaries with tips, shifting the burden of wages onto customers. Jayaraman argues that this is a result of corporate greed, where companies avoid paying fair wages by relying on customer tips. Jayaraman’s journey began in India, influenced by her great-grandfather's restaurant. After moving to the U.S. and graduating from Yale Law School, she found herself involved in the aftermath of 9/11, helping displaced restaurant workers. This led to the creation of One Fair Wage, an organization aimed at eliminating the subminimum wage. Her mission has gained relevance with the current tipping culture, which she believes obscures fair wage practices. Employers can use tips to offset wages, making it unclear if tips actually reach the employees. However, Jayaraman sees victories on the horizon. States like Massachusetts, Arizona, and Michigan are voting on this issue, and places like Washington D.C. and Chicago have already implemented ordinances to ensure fair wages regardless of tips.
Tipping in America has a controversial history. It began as a practice imported by wealthy Americans from Europe and was used to justify paying no wages to newly freed slaves after the abolition of slavery. The subminimum wage for tipped workers was codified in 1938 and remains at $2.13 an hour in many states. Americans have long been divided on tipping. A recent Bankrate survey revealed that 35% of Americans believe tipping culture is out of control. Many tip not out of generosity but to avoid social discomfort. Biases also play a role, with white servers often receiving more tips than servers of color. Despite these issues, some servers prefer the current system, believing it allows them to earn more by providing exceptional service. This raises the question of what a fair alternative would look like.
Several restaurants have tried to eliminate tipping, with mixed results. For example, Danny Meyer’s Union Square Hospitality Group adopted a no-tipping policy in 2015 but reversed it due to staff losses and the impact of the pandemic. Jayaraman argues that isolated efforts are insufficient and that legal changes are necessary. The National Restaurant Association (NRA), representing a significant portion of the industry, opposes eliminating the subminimum wage, arguing it would lead to higher prices and lower tips. Jayaraman counters that in states where fair wages are enforced, such as California, these negative outcomes have not materialized.
The proliferation of tipping requests, or "tip creep," has led to widespread consumer frustration. Recent surveys show that most Americans are tired of the constant pressure to tip and want employers to pay fair wages instead. This resentment is particularly strong towards predetermined tip amounts on payment screens, a practice known as "guilt tipping." Experts like Tim Self from Austin Peay State University suggest that consumers are becoming more comfortable with declining to tip when it feels unwarranted. Financial advisors also recommend tipping based on genuine gratitude rather than obligation.
The pandemic has increased consumers' willingness to show appreciation for service workers, but this goodwill is being eroded by the relentless requests for tips. According to a WalletHub survey, 74% of Americans believe tipping culture is out of control, and many want automatic service charges to be banned. The rise of tip jars and payment screens soliciting tips has added to consumer fatigue. People are increasingly frustrated with being asked to tip for self-service or in situations where it seems unwarranted.
The history of tipping is layered with social and economic complexities. During the post-Civil War era, tipping became a way for employers to sidestep paying newly freed slaves, embedding a system of economic disparity. This practice was cemented into law with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established the federal minimum wage but allowed for a lower wage for tipped employees. This subminimum wage has remained stagnant at $2.13 per hour since 1991, despite inflation and rising living costs.
The social implications of tipping are equally significant. Research from Cornell University indicates that tipping is less about rewarding good service and more about conforming to social norms. This creates a system where servers' incomes are vulnerable to the biases and whims of customers. Studies have shown that white servers often receive higher tips than their non-white counterparts, and younger, more conventionally attractive servers also tend to fare better. This perpetuates a cycle of inequality within the industry.
Despite these issues, many servers advocate for the retention of tipping. They argue that it allows for greater earning potential compared to a fixed hourly wage. Servers often express a preference for the autonomy that comes with tipping, feeling that their performance directly impacts their income. This sentiment is supported by research from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, which found that servers believe they can earn more through tips than a standardized wage.
However, the inconsistencies and inequities of the tipping system have led to various legislative efforts aimed at reform. In states like California, Oregon, and Washington, where there is no subminimum wage, servers earn the state minimum wage before tips. These states have seen success without the negative economic impacts predicted by opponents of wage reform. In fact, restaurant industry growth in these states has outpaced the national average, suggesting that fair wages and tipping can coexist.
The push for legislative change is gaining momentum. In recent years, cities like New York and San Francisco have introduced measures to eliminate the subminimum wage. These efforts are often met with resistance from the NRA, which argues that such changes will lead to increased menu prices and reduced tips, ultimately harming workers. However, data from states with higher minimum wages contradicts these claims, showing that fair wage policies can lead to stable or even increased earnings for service employees.
Jayaraman's advocacy through One Fair Wage highlights the broader implications of tipping culture. Her work underscores the need for systemic change to address the economic exploitation inherent in the current system. By advocating for legislative reform, Jayaraman and her organization aim to ensure that all workers receive a fair wage, independent of customer generosity. This shift would not only provide economic stability for service workers but also alleviate the burden on consumers, who are increasingly expressing frustration with the expectation to supplement employee wages through tips.
The ongoing debate over tipping and fair wages reflects broader societal questions about labor, equity, and economic justice. As consumers become more aware of the disparities and challenges within the service industry, the call for change grows louder. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted these issues, as service workers were deemed essential yet remained underpaid and overworked. This has intensified the push for fair wages and brought greater public attention to the efforts of advocates like Jayaraman.
In conclusion, the fight against the subminimum wage and for fair wages is at a critical juncture. Saru Jayaraman’s persistent advocacy is beginning to resonate more widely, driven by a growing consumer backlash against the pressures of tipping culture. As more states and cities consider legislation to ensure fair wages for all workers, the hope is for a more equitable system that does not rely on the unpredictable nature of tips. The future may hold a shift towards a transparent and just compensation model, where workers are paid fairly by their employers, freeing customers from the constant expectation to tip. This change would mark a significant step towards economic justice for millions of service industry workers across the United States.
In 1995, a new voice emerged on the airwaves that would reshape the landscape of public radio. Ira Glass, co-founder and host of "This American Life," launched the show at WBEZ in Chicago. Over twenty-eight years and more than eight hundred episodes later, "This American Life" has become a cornerstone of audio journalism, setting a template for a genre that has only grown in influence. The show helped pioneer the podcast boom, a phenomenon that gained significant momentum with the launch of "Serial" in 2014, a spinoff from Glass's original show. This genre, characterized by its narrative style and deep dives into varied subjects, has become a staple in modern media. Notable alumni of "This American Life" have gone on to create their own successful ventures, such as Gimlet Media, which Spotify acquired for two hundred and thirty million dollars.
Ira Glass's journey to becoming a seminal figure in audio journalism began in Baltimore, where he grew up with his accountant father, psychologist mother, and two sisters. His early interests included theatre, comedy, and magic. After starting college at Northwestern, Glass interned at NPR, a relationship that continued throughout his college years and after he graduated from Brown University with a degree in semiotics. Glass spent seventeen years at NPR, cutting tape and producing for shows like "Morning Edition" and "All Things Considered." In 1989, he moved to Chicago and later co-created "This American Life." The show's unique format quickly won acclaim, including a Peabody Award.
Glass's three-act structure, conversational tone, and blend of analysis and whimsy have become so familiar they often go unnoticed. His approach to storytelling has influenced many, including "The Daily," The New York Times' flagship podcast, which adopted Glass's narrative style. The show's influence is also seen in production companies like Gimlet, founded by former "This American Life" staffers. Glass's work ethic is formidable. He admits to working most of the time, often sacrificing personal downtime for his craft. He rarely watches movies or television, instead focusing on producing high-quality episodes for "This American Life." His dedication extends to continuous learning and adaptation, even teaching himself digital editing to cut costs when starting the show. Despite the demanding schedule, Glass acknowledges the importance of recharging. A rare vacation left him feeling unusually rested and productive, a reminder of the benefits of balance.
"This American Life" continues to evolve, with recent episodes tackling diverse and timely topics. Glass points to episodes like "That Other Guy," exploring people's quasi-doppelgängers, and "Come Retribution," examining former President Trump's pursuit of vengeance, as some of the best work the show has produced. The show's ability to blend humor with serious journalism is a testament to its enduring appeal. Episodes like "Lists!!!" and deep dives into complex subjects like Trump's speeches in Waco, Texas, showcase its versatility.
Glass's role extends beyond hosting and producing; he is also deeply involved in the business side of the show. From negotiating with public-radio stations to creating engaging pledge-drive content, Glass has navigated the challenges of maintaining and growing an influential media platform. He recalls early efforts to market the show, leveraging creative pledge-drive material to attract stations. These efforts were crucial in establishing "This American Life" as a staple in public radio. The success of "Serial" demonstrated the potential for serialized storytelling in podcasts. This format, initially an experiment, became a significant part of the podcasting landscape. Glass and his team had no guarantees of success but trusted in their innovative approach, which resonated with audiences.
Ira Glass remains optimistic about the future of "This American Life" and the broader podcasting industry. Despite the challenges, he continues to find excitement in uncovering new stories and experimenting with format and content. Glass's commitment to quality and innovation ensures that "This American Life" will remain a vital part of the media landscape for years to come. His influence on audio journalism is profound, shaping not only the content but also the way stories are told and experienced by audiences worldwide.
In recent years, Glass has overseen some of the show's most compelling episodes. For instance, "The Out Crowd," which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2020, provided an in-depth look at the impact of the Trump administration's "Remain in Mexico" policy on asylum seekers. The episode blended rigorous reporting with personal stories, demonstrating the show's continued relevance and ability to tackle complex issues with nuance and empathy.
Glass has also been instrumental in fostering a collaborative environment that encourages creativity among his staff. He regularly holds story meetings where producers pitch ideas and receive feedback from their peers. This collaborative process has been key to maintaining the high quality of the show's content. Glass's leadership style emphasizes mentorship, with a focus on helping younger producers develop their storytelling skills. This approach has not only enriched the show but has also contributed to the growth of the audio journalism field as a whole.
Another significant aspect of Glass's work is his commitment to innovation. He has consistently pushed the boundaries of what audio storytelling can achieve. For example, the episode "The Anatomy of Doubt," co-produced with the team from ProPublica, used a combination of narrative journalism and investigative reporting to tell the story of a young woman who was doubted by law enforcement after reporting a rape. This groundbreaking episode highlighted the power of collaboration between different media organizations and showcased the potential of audio journalism to effect change.
Glass's influence extends beyond "This American Life." He has been a vocal advocate for public radio and podcasting, frequently speaking at industry conferences and events. His insights on the future of audio journalism and the importance of storytelling have inspired countless individuals to pursue careers in the field. Glass's dedication to the craft and his willingness to share his knowledge have solidified his status as a respected figure in the industry.
As the media landscape continues to evolve, "This American Life" remains a beacon of high-quality journalism and storytelling. The show's ability to adapt to changing times while maintaining its core principles is a testament to Glass's vision and leadership. Whether exploring the intricacies of the human experience or delving into pressing social issues, "This American Life" continues to captivate and enlighten its audience.
Glass's personal life also reflects his commitment to his work. Despite his demanding schedule, he has managed to balance his professional and personal life, finding time for hobbies such as biking and spending time with loved ones. This balance is a testament to his ability to manage the pressures of his career while maintaining a sense of personal fulfillment.
Looking ahead, Glass shows no signs of slowing down. He continues to seek out new stories and perspectives, constantly challenging himself and his team to push the envelope. His dedication to storytelling and his passion for audio journalism ensure that "This American Life" will remain a vital and influential force in the media world.
"This American Life" stands as a testament to the power of storytelling. Under Ira Glass's stewardship, it has not only entertained but also educated and inspired countless listeners. As the media landscape continues to evolve, the show's legacy of innovation and excellence will undoubtedly endure, setting a high standard for audio journalism. Glass's influence on the field is immeasurable, and his commitment to quality and integrity serves as a guiding light for future generations of journalists and storytellers.
Source
In Gilbert, Arizona, a town known for its safety and affluence, the existence of a teen gang called the Gilbert Goons went largely unnoticed by authorities until a tragic event unfolded. It wasn't until one boy was dead and seven others were charged with murder that the community began to grapple with the reality of youth violence within its borders.
Gilbert, a town with a reputation for being a prime place for early retirement, raising a family, and trick-or-treating, prided itself on its low crime rate. According to FBI statistics, it had one of the lowest crime rates for a town of its size in 2022. The town, with a population larger than Boise or Salt Lake City, maintained its status as a town rather than a city, preserving its image of a close-knit community. However, this image was shattered late last October.
On a Saturday evening, teenagers in Gilbert were looking for a party. Disappointed with one party, a flyer on Snapchat led them to another in Queen Creek, an upscale neighborhood adjacent to Gilbert. The flyer promised a wild "Halloween costume rager," and soon, teenagers started arriving in various vehicles, dressed in costumes ranging from cowgirls and ballerinas to soldiers and mobsters. The party featured alcohol, beer pong, and marijuana.
Among the attendees was Preston Lord, a sophomore known for his school spirit. He and his friends from the basketball team felt out of place at the wild party and mostly stayed in the garage. As the night progressed, tension escalated when a teenager filmed two partygoers arguing, prompting Treston Billey, dressed in a white pin-striped suit, to demand the video be deleted. The atmosphere became charged with anticipation of a fight.
Lord and his friends decided to leave, followed by a group of older boys dressed as gangsters. The confrontation escalated when the older boys taunted the younger group and began a physical assault on Lord, who was eventually knocked to the ground and brutally beaten. Despite attempts by partygoers to revive him, Lord never regained consciousness and died two days later. The coroner ruled his death a homicide.
The incident led to a series of shocking revelations. A video of Lord's body circulated among teenagers, and messages discussing the assault appeared in group chats. The Queen Creek police, handling their first homicide case since the department's formation in 2022, began an investigation.
Gilbert, once a small town with about five thousand inhabitants in 1980, had grown rapidly due to suburban developments, becoming the fastest-growing municipality in the country during the 1990s. Despite its growth, the town maintained an image of safety and affluence. However, this image concealed a darker reality of escalating teen violence and gang activity.
The Arizona Republic reported that Lord's death was not an isolated incident but part of a troubling trend involving the Gilbert Goons, a group of upper-middle-class teenagers responsible for violent attacks in the area. Despite high school students being aware of the Goons, the Gilbert police had no documented incidents associated with the group name. The newspaper detailed numerous violent attacks by the Goons, with many incidents captured on video and shared online.
In January, a mother of three gave a tour of Gilbert, highlighting its rapid development and the proliferation of shopping centers. She and other parents had become deeply concerned about the rising violence, participating in online discussions and community meetings to address the issue. The community's frustration grew as weeks passed without arrests, leading to public calls for justice and accountability.
The Gilbert Goons, a loosely organized group of about two dozen teenagers, mostly white and wealthy, had been involved in numerous assaults. Their actions were often recorded and shared online, contributing to a sense of invincibility. Despite this, police initially treated the beatings as isolated incidents, with little coordination or recognition of the broader pattern of violence.
The death of Preston Lord marked a turning point. Police investigations intensified, and public pressure mounted. The Goons were eventually designated as a criminal street gang, and law enforcement made several arrests. Seven teenagers faced first-degree murder charges, along with additional charges for aggravated robbery and kidnapping. If convicted, they could face life in prison.
The community of Gilbert, once known for its safety and affluence, was forced to confront the reality of youth violence within its borders. The image of a close-knit, safe town was irrevocably altered, revealing underlying issues of parental neglect, rapid development, and a lack of effective law enforcement. As the community grapples with the aftermath of Lord's death, the need for comprehensive solutions to address youth violence and restore a sense of safety remains paramount.
Source
Keith Gill, widely known as Roaring Kitty, made his first on-camera appearance in over three years in a livestream on Friday. This event led to significant volatility in GameStop’s stock price, which fell over 40% from the morning's peak. The trading was halted eight times within an hour as the stock price fluctuated during Gill's nearly hour-long stream.
Gill, a central figure in the 2021 meme-stock surge, reiterated his confidence in GameStop’s strategy and new CEO, Ryan Cohen, during the livestream. He confirmed that screenshots posted on his Reddit account earlier in the week, showing a brokerage account with over five million GameStop call options, were authentic. "GameStop becomes a bet on the veterans, you know—in particular, of course, [CEO] Ryan Cohen,” Gill stated. “I think we’ve seen enough from him to think he’s got a good head on his shoulders.”
Gill's influence on GameStop began in January 2021 when his Reddit posts and livestreams fueled interest among meme-stock traders, pushing the retailer’s stock price up by over 1,000%. After a three-year hiatus, Gill's return was marked by cryptic posts on Twitter that ignited another rally, doubling GameStop's share price at its peak.
When Gill announced his livestream, GameStop’s share price surged nearly 30%, making him a billionaire on paper based on his call options' value. However, the stock dropped by 25% before the stream and fell another 12% during it, erasing his earlier gains. Gill addressed reports that E*Trade might ban him from the platform, showcasing his continued monitoring of his account.
On May 12, Gill posted a meme on his Twitter account that seemed to signal a call to action. The following day, GameStop’s stock rose by more than 50%, reflecting his considerable influence. Gill, known for leading the meme-stock movement on Reddit, became a key figure for amateur investors. His May 12 tweet, his first in nearly three years, spurred a stream of posts that many interpreted as endorsements of GameStop.
Gill’s holdings, revealed in a June 2 Reddit post, included $115.7 million in GameStop stock and $65.7 million in call options. Despite the stock's volatility, Gill remains significantly invested. His livestream, though bizarre with a fake head bandage and arm sling, confirmed his ongoing commitment to his positions.
While promoting stock is not illegal, Gill’s public disclosure of his holdings invites regulatory scrutiny. "You can’t trade and tweet," warned Lisa Bragança, a former SEC branch chief. In 2021, Gill testified before Congress, denying any intention to manipulate GameStop’s stock for personal gain.
The Massachusetts securities regulator is now investigating Gill's recent conduct. The SEC has not commented on the investigation, but a former chair suggested Gill's actions might not be tolerated. Gill’s livestream included a disclaimer advising viewers not to treat his opinions as investment advice, yet his influence on GameStop’s stock price is evident.
Legal experts note that determining whether Gill violated securities laws depends on his trading history and intentions. His actions, like posting about his positions and influencing stock prices, will be scrutinized. When his call options expire on June 21, Gill faces a decision that could impact his legal standing and financial outcome. Securities law requires advance disclosure of stock sales by individuals in his position.
Gill's case raises questions about the boundaries of market manipulation in the age of social media influencers. The SEC may use this opportunity to set a precedent, aiming to deter similar conduct. Former SEC chair Jay Clayton suggested that the agency seeks to prevent further market volatility caused by influential individuals like Gill.
Gill’s story highlights the evolving challenges regulators face in managing modern market dynamics influenced by social media. The outcome of his case could shape future enforcement and the behavior of market influencers.
Jason DeFord, known to his fans as Jelly Roll, emerged from Antioch, Tennessee, defying the odds stacked against him. A mixtape rapper with a criminal past, Jelly Roll spent years in the southern rap circuit, battling both competitors and addiction. His journey took a transformative turn when he shifted to country music, finding his true voice and openly singing about his pain. At 39, Jelly Roll has become a symbol of redemption and success, inspiring millions, including rock legend Jon Bon Jovi.
The Transition
Jelly Roll's career was at a crossroads when he decided to venture into country music. His rap career had been marked by struggles and personal battles. However, his transition to country allowed him to express his struggles through a different medium, connecting deeply with an audience that related to his raw and honest storytelling.
In a recent conversation with Jon Bon Jovi, Jelly Roll expressed his gratitude and excitement for the newfound clarity in his music. "I feel even better. I’m feeling comfortable in my voice, in the songs I’m writing, and I’ve never been more clear on who I’m singing to," he said. This clarity, he noted, came from realizing his music resonated with hardworking, blue-collar Americans.
Health and Well-being
Jelly Roll has also made significant changes to his lifestyle, prioritizing his health for the first time in his life. He quit drinking as much, improved his diet, and incorporated regular exercise into his routine. These changes have not only improved his physical health but also his mental clarity and singing voice. "I didn’t know you could think this clearly," he laughed, highlighting the positive impact of his healthier habits.
Musical Evolution
Jelly Roll’s music defies traditional genre boundaries. His sound is an amalgam of country, rock, and rap, creating a unique and powerful style. This blend of genres was evident in his recent performance at Stagecoach, where he received rave reviews.
Despite his success in the United States, Jelly Roll has faced challenges in taking his music overseas due to legal issues stemming from his past. He remains hopeful that these hurdles will be overcome soon, allowing him to share his music with a global audience.
Personal Life
Jelly Roll’s journey has been marked by personal milestones, including his recent elopement to Las Vegas, reminiscent of Jon Bon Jovi's own spontaneous wedding decades earlier. This personal connection added depth to their conversation, highlighting the parallels in their lives and careers.
Industry Insights
Jon Bon Jovi offered Jelly Roll valuable advice on maintaining his voice and managing the fast-paced music industry. "Don’t feel bad about asking for help," Bon Jovi advised, sharing insights from his own experiences. He emphasized the importance of seeking support and staying grounded amidst the chaos of a successful music career.
Future Plans
Looking ahead, Jelly Roll is focused on completing his next album, with plans to release it by the end of the year. Despite having released 29 projects throughout his career, he considers this upcoming album his sophomore effort under his current label. His independent spirit remains strong, having retained ownership of his music even as he partners with major labels for distribution and radio promotion.
Jelly Roll’s unique sound and compelling story have positioned him as a rising star in the music industry. His ability to blend different musical styles and his honest, heartfelt lyrics continue to resonate with fans across the country. As he prepares for his first headlining arena tour, Jelly Roll’s journey from the streets of Antioch to the stages of America’s biggest venues serves as a testament to his resilience and talent.
His ongoing conversation with Jon Bon Jovi, a music icon in his own right, underscores the respect and admiration Jelly Roll has earned from his peers. As Bon Jovi aptly put it, "You are Jelly Roll. You have a unique sound, which I think is great because it’s an amalgam of all those things."
Jelly Roll's story is one of transformation, perseverance, and ultimate triumph, inspiring fans and fellow musicians alike. His journey is far from over, and with his upcoming album and tour, Jelly Roll is poised to reach even greater heights.
Source
The quest for longevity and good health is as old as humanity itself, but in recent years, it has taken on a new intensity. Peter Attia, a prominent figure in the field of longevity, challenges the notion that our bodies and minds must inevitably deteriorate in our final years. In his book "Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity," Attia argues that with the right approach, we can maintain our vitality well into old age.
Attia's philosophy is rooted in the belief that science, technology, and targeted efforts can address the challenges of aging. He emphasizes the importance of proactive measures such as regular exercise, healthy eating, sufficient sleep, and nurturing relationships. According to Attia, these lifestyle choices can significantly impact our health span, the period of our lives when we are healthy and free from debilitating illnesses.
One of Attia's key messages is the need to become "athletes of life" by taking care of our bodies and minds throughout our lives. He suggests specific exercises and activities to maintain muscle mass and cardiovascular fitness, highlighting the importance of staying active as we age.
However, Attia's approach has sparked controversy, with critics questioning the validity of his recommendations. Some argue that his intensive regimens may be excessive and unnecessary, advocating instead for a more balanced and holistic approach to aging. Others caution against the pursuit of longevity at all costs, emphasizing the importance of accepting the natural process of aging.
Despite the debate, Attia's message resonates with many who are seeking ways to improve their health and quality of life as they age. His focus on evidence-informed medicine and practical, actionable advice has attracted a large following, inspiring people to take control of their health and well-being.
As we navigate the complexities of aging, Attia's insights remind us of the importance of living a fulfilling life, regardless of our age. While we may not be able to control the passage of time, we can strive to make the most of each day, ensuring that we live with purpose and vitality for as long as possible.
Victor Lustig, a master con artist from Austria-Hungary, weaved a life of audacious scams throughout Europe and the United States in the early 20th century. Nicknamed "the man who sold the Eiffel Tower twice," Lustig's exploits captured headlines and cemented his place as one of history's most cunning tricksters.
Early Days and Shifting Gears
Born in 1890, Lustig displayed a quick mind from a young age. However, his talents turned towards deception by his teens, leading him to card games and other hustles. After leaving school, he honed his skills, becoming fluent in multiple languages and adept at reading people.
Lustig's initial cons targeted wealthy travelers on Atlantic liners. He'd pose as a businessman or producer, swindling unsuspecting victims out of cash. World War I disrupted these operations, prompting Lustig to seek new opportunities in the United States. By this time, he had earned a reputation amongst law enforcement for his clever scams, including one where he tricked a bank into giving him money for fake bonds.
The Eiffel Tower Scheme
In 1925, Lustig stumbled upon a newspaper article discussing the high maintenance costs of the Eiffel Tower. Seeing an opportunity, he hatched a daring plan. He forged government documents and posed as a high-ranking official tasked with secretly selling the Eiffel Tower for scrap metal.
Lustig invited a group of scrap metal dealers to a posh hotel, convincing them the sale was confidential due to public sentiment. He carefully observed the group, identifying Andre Poisson, a businessman eager for prestige, as his prime target.
Lustig played on Poisson's insecurities, portraying himself as a corrupt official seeking a bribe to finalize the deal. Believing he was securing a lucrative opportunity, Poisson paid a hefty sum to Lustig, who promptly vanished with the money.
Confident that Poisson would be too embarrassed to report the crime, Lustig even attempted the same scam later that year with another group of dealers. However, this time, the authorities were alerted, forcing Lustig to flee back to the U.S.
The "Rumanian Box" Scam
Another of Lustig's infamous cons involved a specially designed mahogany box he called the "money box" or "Rumanian Box." He claimed it could duplicate any currency placed inside, taking just six hours. The box had compartments and levers, creating an illusion of a complex machine.
Lustig would convince his mark to insert a specific bill, then secretly swap it with a genuine one hidden within the box. After a supposed "printing" process, Lustig would accompany the mark to a bank to verify the duplicate. Confident in the device's legitimacy, the mark would then be willing to pay a hefty sum for it. Lustig would often pack the box with additional real bills before disappearing, leaving the victim with a worthless device.
Later Years and Downfall
Lustig's audacity even extended to attempting a con on Al Capone. He approached the notorious gangster with a seemingly risky scheme, requesting a small investment. After a staged failure, Lustig convinced Capone to give him a sum of money to "tide him over," further solidifying his image as a trustworthy associate.
However, Lustig's most elaborate scheme involved a large-scale counterfeiting operation in the 1930s. He partnered with others to create counterfeit bills and distribute them through a network of couriers. The influx of fake money eventually drew the attention of federal agents.
Lustig's downfall came from a disgruntled mistress who tipped off authorities. He was arrested and later escaped prison, only to be recaptured. Lustig was sentenced to Alcatraz Island for counterfeiting and died of pneumonia in 1947.
Victor Lustig's life of crime may be a cautionary tale, but his cunning and elaborate cons continue to fascinate even today.
In the realm of agriculture, AI (Artificial Intelligence) presents a double-edged sword. While it offers potential benefits for animal welfare, it also raises significant ethical concerns. As technology advances, the farming industry is increasingly integrating AI into its operations, raising questions about the ethical limits of AI involvement in farming.
Current applications of AI in farming include monitoring and managing animal health through sensors that track various physiological and behavioral indicators. These sensors, coupled with AI algorithms, aim to improve animal welfare by detecting health issues early and optimizing environmental conditions. For example, in the dairy and beef industry, AI can monitor cattle health, reducing the need for intrusive interventions. Similarly, in the poultry and pork industries, AI can ensure animals are well-fed and watered, improving their overall well-being.
However, the integration of AI into farming also poses risks, particularly in intensively farmed systems. For instance, while AI can improve individual animal care, it may also lead to the expansion of inherently low-welfare systems, such as cage-based methods, which prioritize efficiency over animal welfare. This raises concerns about a potential global decline in animal welfare standards as AI drives the adoption of these systems.
Moreover, the increasing reliance on AI in farming raises questions about the autonomy and dignity of farmers. AI-controlled parameters, such as temperature and humidity, could be set remotely by corporations, eroding farmers' control over their own farms and turning them into mere instruments of corporate interests. Additionally, AI's potential to reduce the need for human workers raises concerns about job loss and the nature of agricultural work.
To address these ethical challenges, it is crucial to establish clear guidelines for the use of AI in farming. These guidelines should ensure that AI advancements do not lead to an increase in maximum stocking densities or drive the shift towards greater use of cage-based intensive systems. Additionally, companies should be transparent about welfare problems detected by AI and held accountable for addressing them. AI technologies should also not be used to take autonomy and decision-making power away from frontline farmers.
In conclusion, while AI offers promising advancements for animal welfare in farming, it also presents significant ethical challenges. By establishing and enforcing ethical guidelines, we can ensure that AI in farming serves the interests of both animals and farmers, while upholding ethical standards and preserving the dignity of all involved parties.
Source
In March 2023, a team of researchers embarked on a journey through the Likouala region of the Republic of Congo, guided by Mbendjele BaYaka men, one of the last remaining mobile hunter-gatherer groups. These men led the researchers through the rainforest, seeking their temporary settlements. The researchers observed that the Mbendjele BaYaka's mobile lifestyle was not merely a means of survival but a deliberate choice to maintain a way of life that has persisted for hundreds of thousands of years.
Contrary to traditional narratives, which depict hunter-gatherers as primitive societies struggling for survival, the Mbendjele BaYaka's mobility is part of a larger social network that spans vast territories. This mobility allows them to maintain genetic diversity, share cultural innovations, and avoid inbreeding, ensuring their resilience as a community.
The researchers also found that settling down, as some hunter-gatherer groups have done, can lead to higher fertility rates and increased workload, but also higher disease rates and reduced leisure time. This suggests that the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, with its mobility and abundance of free time, offers unique advantages that are often overlooked.
Ultimately, the Mbendjele BaYaka's choice to remain mobile challenges the notion that settled agriculture is the pinnacle of human progress. Their lifestyle highlights the diversity of human experience and the importance of understanding and preserving alternative ways of life that have sustained us for millennia.
The Mbendjele BaYaka's mobility is not just about moving from place to place; it is a way of life deeply rooted in their culture and worldview. For them, mobility is not a burden but a source of freedom and connection to their environment. It allows them to maintain close ties with other communities and to access a wide range of resources throughout the year.
One of the key aspects of the Mbendjele BaYaka's mobility is their seasonal movements. They move to different locations based on the availability of resources such as food, water, and shelter. During the dry season, they may move closer to rivers or streams where water is more abundant. In the rainy season, they may move to higher ground to avoid flooding. This seasonal movement not only allows them to access resources more efficiently but also helps them avoid overexploiting any one area.
Another important aspect of the Mbendjele BaYaka's mobility is their social organization. They live in small, kin-based groups that are highly egalitarian. Decision-making is often done through consensus, and leadership is informal and temporary. This social structure allows them to adapt quickly to changing environments and to make decisions that benefit the entire group.
The Mbendjele BaYaka's mobility is also closely tied to their spiritual beliefs. They believe that the forest is inhabited by spirits that must be respected and appeased. This belief system reinforces their connection to the land and provides them with a sense of purpose and identity.
In conclusion, the Mbendjele BaYaka's mobile lifestyle is a complex and deeply ingrained way of life that offers important insights into the diversity of human cultures and the adaptability of our species. By studying and understanding their way of life, we can gain a greater appreciation for the many ways in which humans have thrived in diverse environments throughout history.
Source
In the world of sports, fans often face moral dilemmas when players, coaches, or team owners are accused or convicted of wrongdoing. These situations raise questions about the role of fans and the ethical choices they must make.
One such case arose in August 2023, when Manchester United had to decide whether to allow Mason Greenwood, a talented player who had faced serious allegations of rape and assault, back into the team. Fans were also faced with a choice: should they continue to support Greenwood and the team despite the allegations?
This situation is not unique. Across different sports, fans are confronted with similar challenges. In American football, fans of the Cleveland Browns may soon have to support Deshaun Watson, who has been accused of serial harassment. Fans of the Kansas City Chiefs must decide whether to participate in the racially insensitive 'Tomahawk Chop.' In rugby, fans of the Parramatta Eels had to reckon with Dylan Brown's conviction for sexual touching.
When players or teams are involved in such controversies, fans are left to grapple with their ethical responsibilities. As fans, they are deeply invested in their teams, often viewing fandom as a form of love for the community and identity the team represents. This loyalty can be akin to loving a country or a city, with fans identifying with the values and history of their team.
In cases where a player's actions conflict with the values of the team or the fans, supporters may feel compelled to take action. This can range from voicing dissent to boycotting games or withdrawing financial support. Collective action by fans has, in some cases, led to clubs reversing controversial decisions, highlighting the power of fan solidarity.
Critics of fandom may question why fans continue to support teams implicated in wrongdoing. However, for many fans, sports fandom is more than just a hobby; it is a source of meaning and community. Walking away from a team is not a decision made lightly, as it can feel like abandoning a part of one's identity.
In conclusion, navigating the moral risks of fandom requires critical reflection and a willingness to stand up for ethical principles. While sports fandom can provide joy and community, it also demands fans to confront uncomfortable truths and make difficult choices. Ultimately, being a true fan may sometimes mean being willing to walk away.
Source