Maple Sugar and the Pursuit of American Self-Sufficiency

2025

In February of 1791, as Vermont was on the cusp of joining the United States, a letter appeared in the Vermont Gazette under the pen name “Clergyman.” It spoke to the state’s economic and moral potential, urging Vermonters to embrace the production of maple sugar on an industrial scale. At the time, most local sugar production was for personal use, not commerce, but the writer argued this could be a missed opportunity for prosperity.

The letter highlighted the economic difficulties that Vermonters faced during the transition from winter to spring, a time often marked by muddy roads and little work. Yet, during this period of inactivity, the writer saw a chance for local farms to focus on an industry that had deep roots in the region: maple sugaring. Maple syrup production, a practice inherited from the indigenous peoples of the Northeast, could provide not only a reliable source of sweetness but also a key economic opportunity for the state.

Clergyman’s plea was also a call for economic independence. He argued that Vermonters should look inward and create their own sugar rather than rely on imported cane sugar, which was largely produced through the exploitation of enslaved people in the Caribbean. Recent events, such as hurricanes and uprisings in the Caribbean, had disrupted the sugar trade, driving prices higher. This, Clergyman contended, was an opportunity for America to take control of its own sugar production, keeping money within the economy rather than sending it abroad.

The writer saw maple sugar production not just as an economic opportunity, but also as an act of patriotism. He made the case that by producing their own sugar, Vermonters could contribute to the nation’s self-sufficiency and reduce reliance on foreign goods. He emphasized that maple sugar had advantages over imported sugar, including longer shelf life and easier storage, making it a viable and practical choice for Americans.

Another argument in favor of expanding maple sugar production was the ethical consideration of the time. Clergyman pointed out that sugar production in the Caribbean was reliant on the enslavement of Africans. By shifting to maple sugar, Americans could weaken the economic basis for slavery. This anti-slavery argument was part of a broader movement, both in the U.S. and Europe, that sought to reduce the profits of sugar plantations and diminish the demand for enslaved labor. In fact, some prominent Americans, including Dr. Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, saw the expansion of maple sugaring as a moral alternative to the consumption of slave-produced sugar.

Vermonters, according to Clergyman, had a unique opportunity to capitalize on their natural resources. He proposed that farmers devote more attention to maple sugaring during the spring months, when other work was limited. He suggested that if farmers worked collectively, Vermont could generate substantial economic value. Clergyman even calculated that Vermont could be “four thousand pounds richer” in just one season if the state made a concerted effort to increase maple sugar production.

Moreover, Clergyman’s letter argued that Vermont’s economic future should not be dependent on imports. The state had a valuable resource in its abundant maple trees, and it was up to the farmers to take full advantage of that. He believed that reliance on foreign goods, such as molasses, rum, and imported sugar, was not only unnecessary but also detrimental to the local economy.

Although Clergyman's economic arguments were compelling, he also made an emotional appeal, lamenting the tendency of some people to apologize for using homemade maple sugar, as if it were inferior to imported sugar. He decried the habit of proudly serving Caribbean sugar, which he felt was an affront to local resources and efforts. For Clergyman, there was a deep sense of pride in producing one’s own sugar, and he argued that this local production would offer farmers greater dignity and financial independence.

The letter’s message resonated with broader movements of the time. As the new United States sought to establish its identity, there was growing interest in promoting domestic industries and avoiding the reliance on foreign imports. Even figures such as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, during a visit to Vermont later that year, recognized the potential of maple sugaring as a path to economic and moral independence. Jefferson, in particular, saw the value in planting maple trees at his Virginia estate, although the climate there proved unsuitable for sugar production.

Clergyman’s call for a shift in agricultural focus was not just about making money or producing sugar. It was about shaping the future of Vermont and the United States in a way that was economically and ethically sustainable. By advocating for maple sugar production, Clergyman envisioned a future where Americans would produce goods locally, contribute to their economy, and help diminish the moral stain of slavery.

Though Vermont’s maple sugar industry grew over time, it did not immediately transform as Clergyman had hoped. Nevertheless, his message continued to influence national conversations about self-sufficiency and the ethics of production. In the years that followed, maple sugar became an integral part of Vermont’s identity, and the state continues to be one of the leading producers of maple syrup in the country today. The lessons from Clergyman’s 1791 letter still resonate in Vermont’s maple sugaring traditions, which remain a symbol of local pride and self-reliance.

Source